1368: "One Of The"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
squall_line
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:36 am UTC

1368: "One Of The"

Postby squall_line » Wed May 14, 2014 1:38 pm UTC

Image

Title Text: "'The world's greatest [whatever]' is subjective, but 'One of the world's greatest [whatever]s' is clearly objective. Anyway, that's why I got you this 'one of the world's greatest moms' mug!"

This is one of the latest times that a comic has been posted, and one of the first times I have posted a new comic thread.

User avatar
Brace
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:40 am UTC
Location: Denver, Co
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Brace » Wed May 14, 2014 1:43 pm UTC

This post had objectionable content.
Last edited by Brace on Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:53 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
"The future is the only kind of property that the masters willingly concede to the slaves" - Albert Camus

mr-mitch
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:56 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby mr-mitch » Wed May 14, 2014 1:54 pm UTC

I dunno. I've always thought the most recognisable arch of St. Louis was on his left foot.

GreenTom
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:10 am UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby GreenTom » Wed May 14, 2014 1:58 pm UTC

This always seemed to me to be a nod to rigor: never make a factual statement that you can't source.

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby cellocgw » Wed May 14, 2014 2:17 pm UTC

This is one of the funniest xkcd comix ever.


This is also one of the least-funny xkcd comix ever.

This is one of the frist times I've posted a not-frist post. (I can't untangle that -- can anyone else?)

Hey, it could be, and often is worse. Tell me you haven't heard some talking head say ".... this is one of the most unique ..." :(
resume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

doomvox
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:21 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby doomvox » Wed May 14, 2014 2:42 pm UTC

The point here is that hedging when you don't need to hedge isn't
a sign of being reasonable, it's a sign of trying to sound
reasonable-- making a statement that's weaker than it needs to be
isn't being more precise, but less.

And if this bugs you, you should forget about writing for
wikipedia, where your fellow "editors" think they can detect
bias just by wording even if they know nothing about the
subject.

(Wait-- Funny? Is xkcd supposed to be funny?)

User avatar
Coyne
Posts: 1109
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:07 am UTC
Location: Orlando, Florida
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Coyne » Wed May 14, 2014 2:45 pm UTC

Yes, yes, yes, yes!

Someone else notices! I hate this in all its variations. It's like saying:

"Mount Everest, one of the tallest mountains on Earth."
"Our Sun, one of the most important stars we see in our sky."
"Earth, the world on which we live and which we see as one of the most important solid objects in the universe!"
In all fairness...

User avatar
Number3Pencils
The Torment of Existence Weighed against the Horror of Nonbeing
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:27 am UTC
Location: Beyond reason, then take a left
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Number3Pencils » Wed May 14, 2014 2:47 pm UTC

Boy, do I ever hate this too. I've noticed it and gotten annoyed about it and rrgh.

I'm kind of mystified as to why a reporter would currently be doing a story about Eero Saarinen (d. 1961) or Hannskarl Bandel (d. 1993), the designers of the Gateway Arch.
Image
Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
mathmannix
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:12 pm UTC
Location: Washington, DC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby mathmannix » Wed May 14, 2014 2:52 pm UTC

Another one of the most recognizable arches in St. Louis:

Spoiler:
Image
(I just took this picture with Google Maps street view. It is the McDonald's on 13th Avenue, the closest one to the Arch.)
I hear velociraptor tastes like chicken.

User avatar
J L
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:03 am UTC
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby J L » Wed May 14, 2014 2:54 pm UTC

It's probably even one of the 5 most recognizable arches around.

(And it's one of the many instances as of late that made me think of http://xkcd.com/1283/ ...)

writerbenjamin
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 3:24 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby writerbenjamin » Wed May 14, 2014 3:29 pm UTC

I would think that the many Golden Arches would be the more recognizable than the Gateway Arch. "One of the" is appropriate here.

User avatar
suso
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:23 pm UTC
Location: Sky Grund
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby suso » Wed May 14, 2014 3:42 pm UTC

Usually all claims in the media of being the first, last, only, fastest, slowest, biggest or smallest just means that the claimant didn't do enough research.
Imagine theres no signatures....

BunsenH
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:43 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby BunsenH » Wed May 14, 2014 3:54 pm UTC

For many people, the most recognizable arches in St. Louis are the golden ones. :-(

One of my pet peeves is people unnecessarily hedging with the indeterminate-gender pronoun "they" to refer to a specific individual of known sex.

User avatar
Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Whizbang » Wed May 14, 2014 3:56 pm UTC

This is one of the first XKCD comics I read today.

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby cellocgw » Wed May 14, 2014 4:02 pm UTC

BunsenH wrote:One of my pet peeves is people unnecessarily hedging with the indeterminate-gender pronoun "they" to refer to a specific individual of known sex.


Which reminds me: here and there, 'progressive language' folks use the work "xe." I assumed from the context that this is a gender-neutral singular pronoun which, unlike "it," suggests the object in question has a gender. Is this correct? And if so, what pronouns does one use for transgenders, hermaphrodites, etc?
(ok, I'm running for cover now)
resume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

iabervon
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:25 am UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby iabervon » Wed May 14, 2014 4:14 pm UTC

The xkcd store needs to sell "One of the world's greatest mothers" mugs.

ctdonath
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:40 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby ctdonath » Wed May 14, 2014 4:16 pm UTC

Finally I can vent one long-running peeve:

Subaru commercials declaring "still the first sport utility wagon".
No kidding. If was temporally first, nothing is going to displace that without a freakin' time machine.

User avatar
chridd
Has a vermicelli title
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:07 am UTC
Location: ...Earth, I guess?
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby chridd » Wed May 14, 2014 4:19 pm UTC

cellocgw wrote:Which reminds me: here and there, 'progressive language' folks use the work "xe." I assumed from the context that this is a gender-neutral singular pronoun which, unlike "it," suggests the object in question has a gender. Is this correct? And if so, what pronouns does one use for transgenders, hermaphrodites, etc?
I don't think such pronouns imply that the person has gender, any more than any other reference to a person implies that the person has a gender. (He/she or (s)he would have more of an implication that the person has a gender.) The difference between xe/ze/etc. and it, at least to me, is that xe etc. are animate, whereas it is inanimate.
~ chri d. d. /tʃɹɪ.di.di/ (Phonotactics, schmphonotactics) · she · Forum game scores
mittfh wrote:I wish this post was very quotable...

User avatar
Envelope Generator
Posts: 582
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:07 am UTC
Location: pareidolia

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Envelope Generator » Wed May 14, 2014 4:37 pm UTC

You call that a pet peeve? Puny. The Gateway Arch is one of the only arches in St. Louis.
I'm going to step off the LEM now... here we are, Pismo Beach and all the clams we can eat

eSOANEM wrote:If Fonzie's on the order of 100 zeptokelvin, I think he has bigger problems than difracting through doors.

stoppedcaring
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:21 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby stoppedcaring » Wed May 14, 2014 4:49 pm UTC

Envelope Generator wrote:You call that a pet peeve? Puny. The Gateway Arch is one of the only arches in St. Louis.

Actually, given the number of little pewter paperweight arches sold in gas stations and souvenir shops in St. Louis...

User avatar
EpicanicusStrikes
Random Boners = True Attraction
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:36 am UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby EpicanicusStrikes » Wed May 14, 2014 5:08 pm UTC

This is actually about as close as journalism will get to responsible use of hyperbole. They can't say it's 'the' most recognizable arch as that's nearly impossible to quantify in the first place. Converting that to 'one of the' disguises the claim in professionalism, but is still on the wrong side of reporting.

They should instead say 'the highly recognizable', or 'the historic' if they need to punch up their writing.

Should... a lot has changed since my last journalism class. It used to be considered taboo for reporters to insert themselves into a story. These days it's entirely too common. 'Seems like most of what I learned back then has become obsolete in the face of connecting to an audience/chasing ratings.

jigawatt
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:35 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby jigawatt » Wed May 14, 2014 5:29 pm UTC

Where does that reporter get off even calling it "one of the"? Does he have the results of a poll?

No. He's assuming that most everyone would include it as "one of the". If he's willing to make that assumption, he would have no problem assuming most everyone would call it just "the".

As an aside, I live near and work in St. Louis. We're celebrating the 250th birthday of the city this year and there are 250 little fiberglass birthday cake arches all over the metro area - stl250.org They're calling it [groan] "Cakeway to the West".
Last edited by jigawatt on Wed May 14, 2014 5:30 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Whizbang » Wed May 14, 2014 5:30 pm UTC

EpicanicusStrikes wrote:Should... a lot has changed since my last journalism class. It used to be considered taboo for reporters to insert themselves into a story. These days it's entirely too common. 'Seems like most of what I learned back then has become obsolete in the face of connecting to an audience/chasing ratings.


I detest1 watching the news for this very reason. Stop chatting and get on with the reporting. If I wanted to watch Good Morning America, I would have. And what's all this garbage with mobile weather units going "on location" whenever a snowflake hits the ground, interviewing every plow truck driver and pedestrian they can find? Also, if you are going to have the token blond chick with a great rack as co-anchor, at least be honest and just zoom in on those puppies while she speaks.

1In an apathetic way.

User avatar
ilduri
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:59 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby ilduri » Wed May 14, 2014 5:49 pm UTC

BunsenH wrote:...people unnecessarily hedging with the indeterminate-gender pronoun "they" to refer to a specific individual of known sex.

(Pedantry warning)

Actually, gendered pronouns are not chosen on the basis of a person's sex, but on the basis of their gender. Sex refers to what chromosomes\genitals\gonads a person was born with; gender refers to wether someone is a man or a woman (or neither). Sex and gender don't always align: not all men have penises, not all women have XX chromosomes, and so on. It may be pedantic, but the distinction between sex and gender becomes pretty important around folks who are intersex, transgender, or transsexual.

cellocgw wrote:here and there, 'progressive language' folks use the word "xe."

Both xe and it are gender-neutral, the difference is that xe is personal whereas it is impersonal. Xe is especially useful in refering to the "neither"s mentioned above, because singular they sounds weird when refering to a specific person.
Last edited by ilduri on Wed May 14, 2014 6:00 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
"Butterflies and zebras and moonbeams and fairytales"
she/her

Mikeski
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:24 am UTC
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Mikeski » Wed May 14, 2014 5:53 pm UTC

chridd wrote:The difference between xe/ze/etc. and it, at least to me, is that xe etc. are animate, whereas it is inanimate.

That's a rat's nest, too. Ask someone who knows Japanese about the difference between iru and aru. ("to be", for animate and inanimate things.) When the zombie apocalypse comes, you don't want to be arguing whether a zombie is "xe" or "it". You'll just get your brains eaten.

If that's too clear-cut, what about a virus? A venus flytrap? A slime mold? A sunflower? A robot? A (human) sperm cell & egg cell?

(And, as always, I'll mention that one could remember a singular gender-free pronoun that has been used and understood for a very long time, if one tries. One doesn't have to torture another redundant word into the language.)
Last edited by Mikeski on Wed May 14, 2014 6:04 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

PSUnderwood
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:30 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby PSUnderwood » Wed May 14, 2014 6:03 pm UTC

For even greater annoyance, preface "one of the" with "arguably".

User avatar
omgryebread
Posts: 1393
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:03 am UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby omgryebread » Wed May 14, 2014 6:10 pm UTC

Mikeski wrote:(And, as always, I'll mention that one could remember a singular gender-free pronoun that has been used and understood for a very long time, if one tries. One doesn't have to torture another redundant word into the language.)
"One" is indefinite, we need a definite pronoun.

I ran into Alex the other day. One said one would be at the concert this weekend.
Doesn't make a whole lot of sense. "One" is never used to refer to someone specifically. It could be of course, we can make words do whatever we goddamn want them to, but there's a much easier, more natural change.

I ran into Alex the other day. They said they'd be at the concert this weekend.
Incorrect according to some people, but perfectly understandable and natural sounding.

And as for redundant words... that seems an odd, strange, curious, weird, and bizarre objection to have.


Back on topic, my brother briefly worked as an intern at a newspaper, where he spent a lot of time looking at letters to the editor. Apparently you'd be surprised how many complaints they get about completely trivial stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if you'd get letters contesting the fact that the arch is St. Louis's most recognizable.
avatar from Nononono by Lynn Okamoto.

Mikeski
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:24 am UTC
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Mikeski » Wed May 14, 2014 6:18 pm UTC

"Alex" might be both a male and female name, but a specific Alex would be "he" or "she". No need to try to get "one" to work there.
Last edited by Mikeski on Wed May 14, 2014 6:20 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

chris857
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:04 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby chris857 » Wed May 14, 2014 6:19 pm UTC

What about the St. Louis Arches?

City Museum has some arches you can crawl in!

This too is in St. Louis.
Image


The reporter's caution is justified.

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby cellocgw » Wed May 14, 2014 6:31 pm UTC

PSUnderwood wrote:For even greater annoyance, preface "one of the" with "arguably".


And with " actually ."
resume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

speising
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:54 pm UTC
Location: wien

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby speising » Wed May 14, 2014 6:36 pm UTC

"after killing the woman the alledged perpetrator ...."

dp2
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:06 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby dp2 » Wed May 14, 2014 7:01 pm UTC

cellocgw wrote:
PSUnderwood wrote:For even greater annoyance, preface "one of the" with "arguably".


And with " actually ."

I was actually just searching the page to actually see how many times "actually" had already actually been used. I was actually surprised to see it was actually only four.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3653
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby rmsgrey » Wed May 14, 2014 7:42 pm UTC

Arguing that "they" is plural is for people who've given up the fight over "you" (I'm still waiting for "all of all y'all" to emerge as "all y'all" drifts into also covering the singular)

xxnnss
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:08 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby xxnnss » Wed May 14, 2014 8:00 pm UTC

Mmm. One half of the most recognizable arches in St. Louis.

helo darqness
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:46 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby helo darqness » Wed May 14, 2014 8:12 pm UTC

The thing I hate about this is when they say something like, "one of the most expensive construction projects" or something, I inevitably and immediately want to know the superlative THE most. It drives me fucking nuts.

User avatar
da Doctah
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby da Doctah » Wed May 14, 2014 8:13 pm UTC

Envelope Generator wrote:You call that a pet peeve? Puny. The Gateway Arch is one of the only arches in St. Louis.

Fortunately, this usage is becoming increasingly less common.

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 5474
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Pfhorrest » Wed May 14, 2014 8:21 pm UTC

This is one of my first posts in this thread.

Sorry, I meant, this is a very early post of mine in this thread.

Maybe I should just say it's possible the first post of mine in this thread?

I'm pretty sure it will be widely regarded as my first post in this thread, at the least.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 3099
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby orthogon » Wed May 14, 2014 8:50 pm UTC

That it has an arch is one of the few things I know about St Louis. This morning, I didn't even know that. I did know, however, that it is one surprisingly few US cities with an eponymous blues.

BTW, is the "s" silent?
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

Showsni
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:09 pm UTC

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Showsni » Wed May 14, 2014 9:07 pm UTC

To be fair to him, I probably wouldn't have recognised a picture of the Gateway Arch, whereas a picture of a McDonalds logo based in St. Louis would have been easily recognisable.

Of course, saying something is one of something is about as useful as telling you the Arch is visited by up to ten thousand people or more each year.

User avatar
Brace
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:40 am UTC
Location: Denver, Co
Contact:

Re: 1368: "One Of The"

Postby Brace » Wed May 14, 2014 9:47 pm UTC

This post had objectionable content.
Last edited by Brace on Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:53 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
"The future is the only kind of property that the masters willingly concede to the slaves" - Albert Camus


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 109 guests