1292: Pi vs. Tau

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 2055
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby cellocgw » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:00 pm UTC

orthogon wrote:
PolakoVoador wrote:¹I couldn't find a definitive IPA transcription for ão. It seems it can be transcribed as [ɐ̃w̃], [ãw̃], [ãʊ̃], and maybe some other variants.

If even professional cunning linguists can't agree on how to pronounce it, I don't feel quite so bad.
This reminds me that, to a Frenchman, the difference between love and death is just a pout of the lips. (It's the same as the difference between plenty and a nice backside).


FTFY, with Rule34 in effect :oops:
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

User avatar
peewee_RotA
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:19 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby peewee_RotA » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:55 pm UTC

cellocgw wrote:
orthogon wrote:
PolakoVoador wrote:¹I couldn't find a definitive IPA transcription for ão. It seems it can be transcribed as [ɐ̃w̃], [ãw̃], [ãʊ̃], and maybe some other variants.

If even professional cunning linguists can't agree on how to pronounce it, I don't feel quite so bad.
This reminds me that, to a Frenchman, the difference between love and death is just a pout of the lips. (It's the same as the difference between plenty and a nice backside).


FTFY, with Rule34 in effect :oops:


Hopefully this doesn't lead to any fallatious arguments.
"Vowels have trouble getting married in Canada. They can’t pronounce their O’s."

http://timelesstherpg.wordpress.com/about/

Palmstroem
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:28 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Palmstroem » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:33 pm UTC

So this is really a bad kind of joke.
If ever, PAU could only be 0.75 TAU but NEVER EVER 1.5 PI. What a mess of an idea!!! :evil:

User avatar
Moonfish
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 10:40 am UTC
Location: San Diego, California

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Moonfish » Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:04 pm UTC

typo wrote:
Moonfish wrote:The compromise should be the Chinese symbol for Rooster: 酉.

Here are the numbers to go with the traditional symbols.
Spoiler:
Image

Notice how the rat pushes the cat off the ox.

Shouldn't sin(tau) = cos(rooster) = exactly zero? Or is roundoff error part of the tradition?


Yes, Microsoft Excel doesn't use trig-identities or a lookup table so it has a round-off error. Last night I made the chart quickly because it was late and I wanted my post to be near the top.

Really, the chart should indicate that there does not exist an animal which can accompany the Rat, Horse or Cat in a way that will meet the Roster or the Rabbit or vice-versa.
  • sin(子)=0
  • cos(酉)=0
  • sin(午)=0
  • cos(卯)=0
  • sin(猫)=0

cream wobbly
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:07 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby cream wobbly » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:00 pm UTC

PolakoVoador wrote:Pau is actually the slang/crude word for it, like dick or cock.


Obviously a sly reference to Moonfish's suggestion to use "the Chinese symbol for Rooster: 酉", or cock.

User avatar
Klear
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 am UTC
Location: Prague

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Klear » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:09 pm UTC

peewee_RotA wrote:
cellocgw wrote:
orthogon wrote:
PolakoVoador wrote:¹I couldn't find a definitive IPA transcription for ão. It seems it can be transcribed as [ɐ̃w̃], [ãw̃], [ãʊ̃], and maybe some other variants.

If even professional cunning linguists can't agree on how to pronounce it, I don't feel quite so bad.
This reminds me that, to a Frenchman, the difference between love and death is just a pout of the lips. (It's the same as the difference between plenty and a nice backside).


FTFY, with Rule34 in effect :oops:


Hopefully this doesn't lead to any fallatious arguments.


That would suck.

User avatar
jc
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 5:48 pm UTC
Location: Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy
Contact:

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby jc » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:16 pm UTC

Moonfish wrote:The compromise should be the Chinese symbol for Rooster: 酉.


I've seen this before, but those charts are sorta baffling. 酉 isn't the Chinese symbol for rooster; it's pronounced yóu in Mandarin, and is a radical that means wine. (More often you'd see 酒.) It would be pronounced differently in other dialects/languages that use Chinese characters, but would still mean fermented juices. Rooster is 公鸡 (gōng jī) or 雄鸡 (xióng jī), where the second symbol of course means chicken. There are any number of Chinese dictionaries online now, so you can easily look this up. Most of the other symbols in the charts are as badly wrong. Is there some (semi-)sensible explanation of why they did this? Is there some sort of metaphorical connection between male chickens and wine that I'm not seeing?

(Yeah, 公鸡 is a bit bizarre if you look up the pieces, but 雄鸡 literally means "male chicken".)

(And pay no attention to my avatar; she knows nothing about chickens. ;-)

User avatar
Red Hal
Magically Delicious
Posts: 1445
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:42 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Red Hal » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:27 pm UTC

Coq au vin?
Lost Greatest Silent Baby X Y Z. "There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

tijis421
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:16 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby tijis421 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:48 pm UTC

jc wrote:
Moonfish wrote:The compromise should be the Chinese symbol for Rooster: 酉.


I've seen this before, but those charts are sorta baffling. 酉 isn't the Chinese symbol for rooster; it's pronounced yóu in Mandarin, and is a radical that means wine. (More often you'd see 酒.) It would be pronounced differently in other dialects/languages that use Chinese characters, but would still mean fermented juices. Rooster is 公鸡 (gōng jī) or 雄鸡 (xióng jī), where the second symbol of course means chicken. There are any number of Chinese dictionaries online now, so you can easily look this up. Most of the other symbols in the charts are as badly wrong. Is there some (semi-)sensible explanation of why they did this? Is there some sort of metaphorical connection between male chickens and wine that I'm not seeing?

(Yeah, 公鸡 is a bit bizarre if you look up the pieces, but 雄鸡 literally means "male chicken".)

(And pay no attention to my avatar; she knows nothing about chickens. ;-)


Did a little digging, and apparently that symbol references specifically The Year of the Rooster (in the Chinese zodiac), and not the animal itself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooster_(zodiac)

nomadiq
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:57 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby nomadiq » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:58 pm UTC

It really bugs me this obsession with the arithmetic mean. Everyone knows the compromise solution should be (approximately):

4.4428829381583662470158809900606936986146216893756902230853956069564347930994739105753269347647652373634102126852287913643595985183456274923753463596744150232792788197558775331134536611013065221276530194774425487210754103171084527094816028497839310744451018693349370376912502367662868965278459072338293537027968341334261390132571999513151920932970571280772320536651610302756426072196089526770753011078898123946053600601266609761083123933162167957116257394014233745839574936725248532023239776421097324180690297438357604026048774308323656925324071117930277294812528886328259145471099304920717804917268521860513184011650433338124264825037685666242833416484508325374460570658685811163152238933907947870006312834522943221506476856815227748095072579099603143898138603547688754059187856080338167869286047803138691757815707248164765512869327582115023660724139750872509310515861675793274942840999372565997699832638888087983353491441570958154980781032652885213669573597840246487776291167652324697770833097280113...

User avatar
thevicente
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:19 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby thevicente » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:23 pm UTC

Just because people here seem interested, in Brazil the word "pau" depends heavily on context and can mean a lot of the things, not just the one that first came to Polako's mouth.

For example, in computer jargon, crash. As in "the app crashed", " the app gave a pau"

gladiolas
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:41 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby gladiolas » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:32 pm UTC

I know about those algorithms which generate the number pi. But how do we know this isn't the *actual* value of the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter?

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000... and so on.

At the end of Carl Sagan's Contact, somebody generates pi in binary to billions and billions of digits. Then they arrange the digits in a square, and find a perfect circle of...either 0's in a field of 1's, or vice versa, I forget which.

This suggests another interesting possibility. In base 10, or any other base, let each digit represent a different color. Then generate pi to a Graham's number of digits. Arrange various groups of digits in a square, or a cube. Eventually, the (apparently) random numbers, represented as colors, will reveal famous paintings, or photos of exotic locales. Arrange the digits as a cube and you might get 3D images of scenes of your favorite movies. Or if 0 is black and 1 is white, and you get long sequences of 0 and 1, you get black and white images of pages from Google Books, or lengthy sequences of frames of film from famous black-and-white movies. Of course, you'd also be getting images from alien worlds as well.

Wikipedia has a discussion of why the Bible implies pi is 3. The scribe was probably just rounding off to the nearest whole number.

User avatar
Coyoty
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:56 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Coyoty » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:38 pm UTC

webdude wrote:DOUBLE ENTENDRE, ANYONE?

In Hawaiian, pau means finished. As in done, finito, case closed. As in the L.A. Lakers without Kobe? Pau.

Pau FTW!


So the climax of the movie "American Hawaiian Portuguese 1.5 Pi" would be a pau pau pau?

User avatar
Klear
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 am UTC
Location: Prague

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Klear » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:43 pm UTC

Hmmm... this reminds me of a discussion I had with my friend once. Given some sensible mapping of numbers to letters, there is the whole Hamlet contained somewhere within pi, right? So what we were wondering is whether Hamlet is likely to be found sooner than Graham number-th digit of pi, or not. None of us had any idea how it even begin to estimate that. I just reasoned that one of the numbers must be quite extremely smaller than the other.

gladiolas' post seems to suggest that Graham's number wins by far. Is that so? I was leaning towards that option as well...

User avatar
PolakoVoador
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:11 pm UTC
Location: Brazil

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby PolakoVoador » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:50 pm UTC

thevicente wrote:Just because people here seem interested, in Brazil the word "pau" depends heavily on context and can mean a lot of the things, not just the one that first came to Polako's mouth.

For example, in computer jargon, crash. As in "the app crashed", " the app gave a pau"


It also means "wood", but what is the fun in that? :P

User avatar
JohnTheWysard
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:38 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby JohnTheWysard » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:57 pm UTC

danhaas wrote:Pau means "Penis" in portuguese, so this discussion is quite cringesworthy for me.


Interesting. If I remember aright, "pau" is Hawaiian for "nothing, negligible", for instance "Is there any beer left?" "Pau!"

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26767
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby gmalivuk » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:00 pm UTC

gladiolas wrote:I know about those algorithms which generate the number pi. But how do we know this isn't the *actual* value of the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter?
Some of the algorithms are derived directly from the definition of a (Euclidean) circle, and the rest of them can be proven to converge on the same number.

Klear wrote:Hmmm... this reminds me of a discussion I had with my friend once. Given some sensible mapping of numbers to letters, there is the whole Hamlet contained somewhere within pi, right? So what we were wondering is whether Hamlet is likely to be found sooner than Graham number-th digit of pi, or not. None of us had any idea how it even begin to estimate that. I just reasoned that one of the numbers must be quite extremely smaller than the other.

gladiolas' post seems to suggest that Graham's number wins by far. Is that so? I was leaning towards that option as well...
Graham's number is so much larger than anything you could possibly wrap your head around that it is very, very likely that the whole of all the text produced in the history of humanity, once encoded with some appropriate scheme, appears not once but millions of times in the first Graham's number of digits of a normal number (which pi is believed but not proven to be).

The expected position of a subsequence N characters long in a random string from an alphabet of B characters is B^N. So, converting a normal number to base-128 and using ASCII, we can expect the 250,000 or so characters of Hamlet to show up somewhere around the 128250000th position. This seems like a lot, but relative to Graham's number it's basically indistinguishable from the number of thumbs I have on my left hand.
Last edited by gmalivuk on Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:06 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

User avatar
Moonfish
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 10:40 am UTC
Location: San Diego, California

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Moonfish » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:02 pm UTC

tijis421 wrote:
jc wrote:
Moonfish wrote:The compromise should be the Chinese symbol for Rooster: 酉.


I've seen this before, but those charts are sorta baffling. 酉 isn't the Chinese symbol for rooster; it's pronounced yóu in Mandarin, and is a radical that means wine. (More often you'd see 酒.)



I did my best with the chart. However while I've tried to learn Mandarin a few times, I still only speak English. It's possible I've gotten some things wrong. Can someone help me find more information about these symbols?

In my research, I first found information in pages about the Chinese Zodiac
Particularly of note was the following wikimedia picture about the 24 cardinal directions used in Chinese navigation:
Image
I then consulted some friends in China. (And also bought some World of Warcraft gold so that their boss wouldn't get mad about the chatting.)
My friends had similar notes that 酉 doesn't typically mean "Rooster" but agreed that the picture seemed legitimate.

I was particularly interested in a number symbol for Cat. I thought it was interesting that the story of the Zodiac made note of both a Rat as the minimum, 0% turn element and a Cat as the maximum, 100% turn element but recognized that the two were the same thing and the system would have problems if both where included.


I would like to know more about what the symbols in the picture actually mean and also how trigonometry works in classic Chinese cartography and navigation.

I also think that pi is stuck in a futile 18th century attempt to mathematically prove the existence of God. Tau is better but requires a more modern approach to the concept of a maximum and infinity.

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 3081
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby orthogon » Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:23 pm UTC

Klear wrote: Given some sensible mapping of numbers to letters, there is the whole Hamlet contained somewhere within pi, right?

... or even given some non-sensible mapping, such as UTF-8 </troll>

ETA: Of course, Hindi speakers would have to wait considerably longer for the translation to appear in Devanagari script.
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

Zowayix
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:20 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Zowayix » Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:12 pm UTC

To those who haven't heard about tau before, feel free to look up the Tau Manifesto.

Personally, I will always be an advocate for tau. Given how fundamental the circle constant is, I'm honestly surprised Randall apparently isn't.

alanbbent
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:46 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby alanbbent » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:05 am UTC

PolakoVoador wrote:It also means "wood", but what is the fun in that? :P


Yes, I remember learning the translation as "wood" or "stick," but then while I was living in Brazil, I heard "quem toma Fanta, o pau levanta." and I learned a little more Portuguese that day.

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26767
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby gmalivuk » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:32 am UTC

Or maybe they were just telling you that Fanta makes good tree fertilizer.

Zowayix wrote:To those who haven't heard about tau before, feel free to look up the Tau Manifesto.

Personally, I will always be an advocate for tau. Given how fundamental the circle constant is, I'm honestly surprised Randall apparently isn't.
Given how few tauists work with advanced mathematics compared to things like math education, I'm not surprised at all.
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

rmsgrey
Posts: 3633
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby rmsgrey » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:45 am UTC

Zowayix wrote:To those who haven't heard about tau before, feel free to look up the Tau Manifesto.

Personally, I will always be an advocate for tau. Given how fundamental the circle constant is, I'm honestly surprised Randall apparently isn't.


There are some situations where Pi is more convenient - for example, the formula (T*r^2)/2 (using T for tau because I'm too lazy to figure out how to extort Greek letters out of this keyboard) is less appealing than the pi-based equivalent.

lgw
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:52 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby lgw » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:49 am UTC

orthogon wrote:
Klear wrote: Given some sensible mapping of numbers to letters, there is the whole Hamlet contained somewhere within pi, right?

... or even given some non-sensible mapping, such as UTF-8 </troll>

ETA: Of course, Hindi speakers would have to wait considerably longer for the translation to appear in Devanagari script.


Is there a Unicode codeplane for Klingon yet, to encode Hamlet as originally written?

(BTW, the "Hamlet in Klingon" I've seen is pretty bad - Hamlet is so crammed full of alliterative poetry and wordplay that it's just not the same in translation.)
"In no set of physics laws do you get two cats." - doogly

mschmidt62
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:09 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby mschmidt62 » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:50 am UTC

rmsgrey wrote:
There are some situations where Pi is more convenient - for example, the formula (T*r^2)/2 (using T for tau because I'm too lazy to figure out how to extort Greek letters out of this keyboard) is less appealing than the pi-based equivalent.


Michael Hartl argues that, while the formula for the area of a circle make look neater with π than with tau, the 2 in the denominator for the tau formula shows up in other integrations with a quadratic dimension. So the 2 in the denominator reminds us of the integral nature of the area calculation. See his earlier-referenced Tau Manifesto.

I am glad Randall brought this whole issue to my attention. I will be a tau advocate from now on.

User avatar
Copper Bezel
Posts: 2426
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 am UTC
Location: Web exclusive!

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Copper Bezel » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 am UTC

Yeah, I guess if you've not seen this before, here is as good a place to gush as any.

I certainly prefer tau, and I wouldn't have to think about radians using it, but it's pretty obvious irk it's not changing....
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.

she / her / her

JustMe
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:21 pm UTC
Location: Washington (the real one - not D.C)

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby JustMe » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:31 am UTC

I think when the formula's easier with pi, you should use pi. When it's easier with tau, you should use tau.

That's why I'm an engineer and not a mathematician.
I have traveled from 1963 to be a member of the unofficial board Council of Elders. Phear M3

kodegadulo
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:56 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby kodegadulo » Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:06 am UTC

A Triple Couplet on the pau Identity

Once Euler doth on thee raise up his eye,
Who knoweth what ill end betides? Not I!
Dost thou turn three quadrants to the south?
Meanst thou to head down Hades' foul mouth?
Thou mean twixt half-baked pi and fulsome tau!
I say but \phi on thee, thou parlous pau!

ei pau = -i

;)

kodegadulo
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:56 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby kodegadulo » Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:08 am UTC

A Triple Couplet on the pau Identity

Once Euler doth on thee raise up his eye,
Who knoweth what ill end betides? Not I!
Dost thou turn three quadrants to the south?
Meanst thou to head down Hades' foul mouth?
Thou mean twixt half-baked pi and fulsome tau!
I say but \phi on thee, thou parlous pau!

ei pau = -i

;)

mschmidt62
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:09 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby mschmidt62 » Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:17 am UTC

Copper Bezel wrote:Yeah, I guess if you've not seen this before, here is as good a place to gush as any.


It's such a shame that they let the common folk post in these message boards.

User avatar
keithl
Posts: 661
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:46 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby keithl » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:03 am UTC

MathUhhhSaurus wrote:This reminds me of how the inverse of an ohm was referred to as a mho before they changed it.
I still like to call them mhos. Reminds me that electrical engineers can actually be funny on occasion.

Agreed. Larry, Siemens, and Curly just doesn't sound right.

Elmach
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:47 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Elmach » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:11 am UTC

I like sqrt(tau) or sqrt(2pi) as the fundamental circle constant; a lot of things become so much nicer. I'll just use the symbol ռ for it.

See, it has all the advantages of tau whenever you need it, but it also has the added benefit of

EDIT: Wow, I just looked up stuff I thought would look better with this, and I can't find anything.

But still, ռ is a goodish idea. Better than 2ռ2/3, anyways.

User avatar
Bernkastel
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:04 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Bernkastel » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:25 am UTC

Moonfish wrote:The compromise should be the Chinese symbol for Rooster: 酉.

Math is always running out of symbols and it should be more culturally inclusive anyway.

There is a wonderful story about animals racing across a river that helps people remember the order.

Image

Here are the numbers to go with the traditional symbols.
Image

Notice how the rat pushes the cat off the ox.

I second this notion.

Kit.
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:14 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Kit. » Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:28 am UTC

thevicente wrote:Just because people here seem interested, in Brazil the word "pau" depends heavily on context and can mean a lot of the things, not just the one that first came to Polako's mouth.

For example, in computer jargon, crash. As in "the app crashed", " the app gave a pau"

"The app gave a dick"

Seems legit.

BlueSloth
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:49 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby BlueSloth » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:17 pm UTC

Ok, wait..

Octal digits of pau according to bc (with a few extra digits beyond 200 since bc was having trouble getting the last 3 digits right):

Code: Select all

echo "scale=190; obase=8; 6*a(1)" | bc -l
4.554574376314416443236234514475050122425471573015650314763354527003\
04316771261165505467475703133125234035147165764643331727311243102010\
76447270723624573721640220437652155065544220143116155742515634462136\
362517430


Octal digits of pau according to sage:

Code: Select all

echo "floor((3/2)*pi*8^200).digits(base=8, padto=201)" | sage | grep "\[" | tr -cd "[:digit:]" | rev
455457437631441644323623451447505012242547157301565031476335452700304316771261165505467475703133125234035147165764643331727311243102010764472707236245737216402204376521550655442201431161557425156344621

Those agree with each other, but only agree with Tasrayryn's number up to the 18th digit. And they don't have 666 in them anywhere :(

Which one of us is wrong?

Also, does anybody know an easier way to get octal digits out of sage?

BTW, here's e+2 in octal. Also no 666.

Code: Select all

echo "scale=190; obase=8; e(1)+2" | bc -l
4.557605213050535512465277342542004717236361661347054074705515512651\
70233101050620637674622347347044466373713722774330661414353543664033\
10025354214136551737075527257726254111031765076574063355020530662525\
173664324

User avatar
nwm
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:27 am UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby nwm » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:00 am UTC

BlueSloth wrote:Ok, wait..

Octal digits of pau according to bc (with a few extra digits beyond 200 since bc was having trouble getting the last 3 digits right):

Code: Select all

echo "scale=190; obase=8; 6*a(1)" | bc -l
4.554574376314416443236234514475050122425471573015650314763354527003\
04316771261165505467475703133125234035147165764643331727311243102010\
76447270723624573721640220437652155065544220143116155742515634462136\
362517430


Octal digits of pau according to sage:

Code: Select all

echo "floor((3/2)*pi*8^200).digits(base=8, padto=201)" | sage | grep "\[" | tr -cd "[:digit:]" | rev
455457437631441644323623451447505012242547157301565031476335452700304316771261165505467475703133125234035147165764643331727311243102010764472707236245737216402204376521550655442201431161557425156344621

Those agree with each other, but only agree with Tasrayryn's number up to the 18th digit. And they don't have 666 in them anywhere :(

Which one of us is wrong?

Also, does anybody know an easier way to get octal digits out of sage?

BTW, here's e+2 in octal. Also no 666.

Code: Select all

echo "scale=190; obase=8; e(1)+2" | bc -l
4.557605213050535512465277342542004717236361661347054074705515512651\
70233101050620637674622347347044466373713722774330661414353543664033\
10025354214136551737075527257726254111031765076574063355020530662525\
173664324


According to my calculations you are correct. Also I have no idea how Tasrayryn could have arrived at the digits he has. :| The first 501 octal digits are:

Code: Select all

4.5545743763144164432362345144750501224254715730156503147633545270030431677126116550546747570313312523
4035147165764643331727311243102010764472707236245737216402204376521550655442201431161557425156344621
3636251744101107770261115602411744712522417620371633674205735330321647025766266674462753432550433450
6002730517102547504145216661211250027531716641276765735563341721214013553453654106045245066401141437
7406267077573054507036064406511117752700327100355213521015136220621644573043264505244325316526666260


So there are triplets of 3 at the 116th, of 7 at the 216th, of 1 at the 222th and of 6 at the 278th and 325th decimal place, but there are also quadruplets of 1th at the 430th and of 6th at the 494th decimal place. It seems the title text was already changed once, but it is still incorrect even considering the first 500 digits.

User avatar
Copper Bezel
Posts: 2426
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 am UTC
Location: Web exclusive!

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Copper Bezel » Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:11 pm UTC

mschmidt62 wrote:
Copper Bezel wrote:Yeah, I guess if you've not seen this before, here is as good a place to gush as any.


It's such a shame that they let the common folk post in these message boards.


I actually meant it - I wasn't trying at being elitist. I don't know maths, for one thing. = ) Lucky 10,000, right?
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.

she / her / her

User avatar
Shamino
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 2:02 pm UTC

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Shamino » Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:29 pm UTC

So would a compromise between Pau and Tau (1.75 Pi) be the Vulcan constant T'Pau? :D

(Ducking and running away now...)

User avatar
Quizatzhaderac
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby Quizatzhaderac » Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:54 pm UTC

Bah! I'd say throw both out for most situations. Change our units to reflect the transformations we're making; when we actually need to fill a circular areas with squares, or circumscribe it with straight line segments. use a formula that accounts for the heuristic nature of what you're doing.

m = one meter of distance, not distance projected onto a curve.
mc = one meter circled (formerly pi m2)
mc = the border of one meter circled, aka the circumference (formerly 2 pi m)
ms = one meter sphered (formerly 4/3 pi m3)
ms = the border of one meter sphered, aka the surface area (formerly 4 pi m2)
m2 = Area constructed of rectangles (between one and any tractable number)
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.

brenok
Needs Directions
Posts: 507
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:35 pm UTC
Location: Brazil

Re: 1292: Pi vs. Tau

Postby brenok » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:00 am UTC

Shamino wrote:So would a compromise between Pau and Tau (1.75 Pi) be the Vulcan constant T'Pau? :D

(Ducking and running away now...)

You're toying with powerful forces here...


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GlassHouses and 45 guests