I suppose, if votes are getting serious:Unvote
jimbobmacdoodle wrote:JackHK: one of the more active players. First post is basically an agreement with others, then an odd question as to whether to random vote, especially given others already had.
To clarify, I think at that point only one person had done a random vote, so I was unsure whether random voting was going to be a thing.
jimbobmacdoodle wrote:@jack/moody/SirGabriel - what are your thoughts on other people?
: Concerns about Madge - I think this is warranted, such a weird play at the start could mean many things, not all of them good - but also thinks Madge is telling truth about being independent. I see the reasoning, but I'm not quite ready to make up my mind about Madge yet. Otherwise nothing suspicious.
: Thinks we should keep Madge in reserve for "safe" lynch. Seems a reasonable idea, so long as we can find someone else to lynch for the moment who is even more likely to be scum. Concerns about ConMan
sharing info about role, though this seems to be about ConMan
saying that his power is weak. I can see why Carlington
is worried about this making mafia more likely to get powerful roles... hmmmm. Fortunately I think the info I've shared about my own role is sufficiently vague as to not give scum useful info. Thinks moody not using the same "oath" is nothing to worry about - I agree, seeing everyone's arguments regarding the issue. Nothing scummy AFAICT.
: Immediately reveals info about role. Agree with Carlington
that this is a bit of an odd move for town, but cannot be too judgemental, given the info I revealed. Justifies himself with argument I will tentatively accept. Otherwise nothing. Not much to go on.
: Notices moody7277
's different oath. Decides to ignore Madge
for now.... not sure it's the best idea, but can understand. Agree with their comments about cult - FWIW I have no information about cults. Later manages to convince me I was being paranoid wrt moody
- his reasoning strikes me as justified.
: Not much to talk about here, but like jimbob
said, at least we know they're not deliberately obfuscating.
: Mentions preferring not to vote at least for the first two days. Not sure which roles that points to. Some speculation on roles - not sure whether it was useful to do, but otherwise nothing objectionable. Confused about Madge, which is perfectly reasonable - isn't everybody? Later does v. good analysis on everybody - I find my self agreeing with much of what he said.
: Like I said, not sure what to do about her. Part of me wants to lynch her just because we know she's not town - and then the other half of me wants to keep her in just to make the game more exciting, like dimochka
. I'm not even sure if she's telling the truth.
: Umm, nothing posted yet, I think.
: Was at first suspicious about the oath thing, but after dimochka
's reasoning, am agreeing that they are probably one of the more town-ish players. Was willing to ignore Madge, laer mentions possibility of her being scum, would appreciate clarification of their thoughts about her.
: Not much to go on here. Brought up the possibility of a lie detector - is he one? Would make it likely for people to say things like " I am town" for checking, I suppose. Otherwise nothing particularly suspicious.
: Suspects dimochka
and myself a little for the "oath" thing with moody
, which I reckon was justified, so can't hold it against them.
Does a little set-up spec, nothing particularly memorable.
I second all jimbob's questions.
People I'd like to hear more from: adnapemit
People I'm pretty happy with for now: Carlington
People I'm FOSing: Madge