## "How many X can Y survive" fallacy - is this common?

For the discussion of language mechanics, grammar, vocabulary, trends, and other such linguistic topics, in english and other languages.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

ekolis
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:44 pm UTC
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Contact:

### "How many X can Y survive" fallacy - is this common?

I realized the other day that if I'm asked a question of the form "How many X can Y survive?" that I answer as if it were asked "How many X will it take to destroy Y?" - that is, one more than the answer to the original question! Is this a common mistake, or am I just crazy?
Reading posts on the xkcd forum makes me feel stupid.

gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26823
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

### Re: "How many X can Y survive" fallacy - is this common?

Do you have any examples of specific things where people say this? I imagine that most of the time, the numbers are high enough that a difference of 1 is less than the errors on the estimate itself.
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

ekolis
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:44 pm UTC
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Contact:

### Re: "How many X can Y survive" fallacy - is this common?

Well, actually, this question was prompted by this post I made on reddit... I said that a sandwich can survive five bites from the Heavy in TF2, but later realized that after five bites, the sandwich is gone, so the sandwich could actually only survive four!
Reading posts on the xkcd forum makes me feel stupid.

Lynx Cat
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:10 pm UTC
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Contact:

### Re: "How many X can Y survive" fallacy - is this common?

Well, yeah. To me it seems pretty obvious that "survive" entails "before dying/being destroyed". So, in the original wording, if Y is destroyed by (n) X, then Y can survive (n-1) X. As long as the estimate is precise enough that 1 will make a difference, as gmalivuk pointed out...
LIVE FOREVER OR DIE TRYING

TheGrammarBolshevik
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it.

### Re: "How many X can Y survive" fallacy - is this common?

I don't play TF2, but if I have some sort of \$healing_item I'm generally not going to be concerned with its survival. It doesn't matter to me how long I can continue to have at least some portion of a healing item in my inventory; what matters is how many times I can use it. So, I just don't expect people to ask me how many uses it can survive. If someone does ask a question like that, I'll probably quickly assume they used a weird phrasing and answer what I would expect them to be asking: how many times can \$healing_item be used?

In contrast, when you're talking about something like the survival of a player character, in general the question literally is "How many hits can this guy survive?", and not "How much use can we get out of this guy's health bar?" So, it's more natural to talk about how Chansey can survive Machamp's Submission. (If I'm the guy with Machamp, though, I'm probably also going to be thinking about how it will take two Submissions to knock out Chansey.)
Nothing rhymes with orange,
Not even sporange.