Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

Doctor Nick
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:51 am UTC

Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby Doctor Nick » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:22 am UTC

This was posted today:

which seems to refer to this xkcd strip:

It looks like a blatant jab at xkcd, especially considering the last few strips. What do you guys think?

edit: The above strip is from here
Last edited by Doctor Nick on Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:29 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Posts: 1080
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:04 am UTC
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby Fossa » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:25 am UTC

I think the author of the first strip is a sad little man.

The Mighty Thesaurus
In your library, eating your students
Posts: 4399
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:47 am UTC
Location: The Daily Bugle

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby The Mighty Thesaurus » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:27 am UTC

And why is the author's definition of adulthood more meaningful than mine?

LE4dGOLEM wrote:your ability to tell things from things remains one of your skills.
Weeks wrote:Not only can you tell things from things, you can recognize when a thing is a thing

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

User avatar
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:10 am UTC

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby diotimajsh » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:50 am UTC

Eh, knowing how the author (John Campbell) of Pictures for Sad Children normally writes (i.e., with lots of dry irony), it's hard to say whether John genuinely endorses that sentiment. At any rate, I doubt it's hostile. This strip does obviously refer to XKCD, but it's a guest comic, and rather playful.

Actually, the discussion of the singularity in an earlier comic makes me think this is aimed more at Dresden Codak, if anything. Especially since in the last panel the ghost holds up a panel with a hole in it while he speaks about the "crushing vacuousness of their lives," which is faintly reminiscent of this Dresden Codak stall strip.
Osha wrote:Foolish Patriarchy! Your feeble attempts at social pressure have no effect on my invincible awesomeness! Bwahahahaa

Blog type thing

User avatar
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:36 pm UTC
Location: Chile

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby Memo » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:01 am UTC

Alert! Alert! Someone is talking about NERDS on the internet.

User avatar
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
As the Arbiter of Everything, Everything Sucks
Posts: 8314
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:17 pm UTC

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:36 am UTC

Pictures for Sad Children is mostly a comic about a guy who is dead, and also an asshole. Take this one seriously if you want, but really it's just an opposing viewpoint and I don't think it's calling out XKCD. As was stated, Paul is an asshole. He's the one wearing the sheet. It's cause he's dead.
I fucking love that webcomic so much, too.
Heyyy baby wanna kill all humans?

User avatar
Miles Invictus
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: Iowa

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby Miles Invictus » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:31 pm UTC

Some of my favorite comics have been featured on Your Webcomic is Bad. I hope you'll excuse me if I can't get worked up over this.

User avatar
pretty nice future dick
Posts: 8933
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:33 pm UTC
Location: One of those hot places

Re: Pictures for Sad Children calls out xkcd?

Postby Bakemaster » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:41 pm UTC

So... is he burning an LP, or what?
c0 = 2.13085531 × 1014 smoots per fortnight
"Apparently you can't summon an alternate timeline clone of your inner demon, guys! Remember that." —Noc

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests