Page 21 of 23

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:15 am UTC
by Vytron
Unless thecamoninja is a girl, the thing about the nakedness is a no-no. Also, has a link to a Youtube video, that's neutral.

7/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:19 am UTC
by flicky1991
Great choices! 9/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:38 am UTC
by thecamoninja
Vytron wrote:Unless thecamoninja is a girl, the thing about the nakedness is a no-no.

Sexist and/or homophobe! The male form is just as attractive as the female. Now if you had said "unless he's hot", it would be a different matter.

I;m leaving off my signature, so whoever's below me just do Flicky's instead, as I just did his. I needed to respond to Vytron, though.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:02 am UTC
by dudiobugtron
The music in Flicky's sig is pretty awesome (a bit painful if your volume is up too loud though ;) ). I wouldn't have clicked on it if I didn't have to review Flicky's sig, so I'm lucky I made a new sig and then posted in this thread!

Also I loled at that quote from the You Must Not Kill Flicky thread when I first read it, so I'm glad it's been preserved in a sig. It is a bit boring looking though.

Overall a 6 which is bumped up to an 8 because I enjoyed listening to Dangerous Journey. If the music was somehow playable from within the sig I would give it a 9 or 10.
So:
8/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:57 am UTC
by marionic
A strange sig that links to something strange? 10/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:34 am UTC
by Vytron
thecamoninja wrote:I;m leaving off my signature, so whoever's below me just do Flicky's instead, as I just did his. I needed to respond to Vytron, though.


Whoa! That was not my intention, so I apologize if I offended you in any way or something.

I don't think wanting to avoid same-gender nudity is sexist though, and expect that most heterosexual people will mostly avoid seeing same-gender nudity and erotic related material (which, I put together in the same sentence because I find different-gender nudity blurring with the latter.)

As for marionic's sig, I like the quote, though, one can't click it for context.

I'm not a fan of educomix, or poorly drawn comics (on purpose) on general. Seems like a pretext to avoid improving by just pointing out "I know it's badly drawn, that's the point!"

Overall 7/10. UNLESS educomix is marionic's online comic. In that case, 8/10 or something, I've always wanted to have one, and even have notebooks full of hand-drawn comics that could be uploaded, but I have been victim of laziness.

Note - I'm ridiculously exigent when it comes to sigs, and extremely critical, so these scores I've been giving should be really good on a Vytron scale (say 7/10=970/100 of other scales, etc.)

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:06 am UTC
by thecamoninja
My point is that the quality of/rating you give my sig shouldn't be dependent on your gender. That quote is more of a humor thing, anyways, than about me personally. It's from a song.


As for your sig, I'm fond of the pokemans, but I've never played Gen V (that's gen V right?) and am of the opinion that the quality of the new pokemans, if not the games themselves, have been deteriorating. No idea what any of those are, but they're cute, flicky said they were good choices, and they don't appear too ridiculous, so I suppose you can have a good score. Minus points for that one on the end, though. he's a starter, right? Well, I don't like the look of him. Furthermore, you have seven pokemans there! You can't have seven pokemans! That's ridiculous!

7.5/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:18 am UTC
by Vytron
thecamoninja wrote:My point is that the quality of/rating you give my sig shouldn't be dependent on your gender.


It wasn't, I'd have given you a 6 if it was dependent on gender, and 8 if it was and I was a girl, or something. So it evened out as 7. I'll listen to the song later on, and bump it accordingly.

thecamoninja wrote:if not the games themselves, have been deteriorating.


Agreed, I think these 7 are the only decent ones from this generation. The games have been deteriorating since Ruby/Sapphire, I haven't even played any afterwards.

thecamoninja wrote:Minus points for that one on the end, though. he's a starter, right? Well, I don't like the look of him.


Oh, please don't dismiss it and take a closer look.

Image

I think he has the profile of the Lancer. Think Vegeta of DBZ or Wolverine from the Xmen. This guy has the attitude, and I'll even claim that if Pokémon had a Five Man Band (of first stage Pokémon of 3 stages), Snivy has to be in it because no other such Pokémon could fit this role better.

thecamoninja wrote:Furthermore, you have seven pokemans there! You can't have seven pokemans! That's ridiculous!


Exactly. I have 6 Pokémon in my sig, because Image and Image are the same one! (Meloetta) So it's like having a picture of Zelda and Sheik in my sig, and complaining that I have two girls (but it's the same one, like, Samus and Zero Suit Samus, or something.)

Heh, I don't even know if I was supposed to defend my sig, but there it goes.

Reminder to next poster: I already did thecamoninja's, so please do his sig next.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:52 pm UTC
by careyhammer
3/10
Animated Pokemen are annoying

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:24 pm UTC
by flicky1991
Vytron wrote:Overall 7/10. UNLESS educomix is marionic's online comic. In that case, 8/10 or something

Yes, it's his own comic.

7/10 because I like both the quote and the fact that you linked to the Nomic.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:00 pm UTC
by Vytron
flicky1991 wrote:Yes, it's his own comic.


Wow! Then I must take back my comments that applied as if he was linking to someone else's comic, and bump him accordingly to 8.5/10 for effort (because, it takes more effort to have a comic online, even if "badly drawn", than it takes to have none - and because Educomix is a thing, with a TVTropes page and all, so Marionic even is someone I admire and I feel like I'm posting in a forum with a celebrity, or something, LOL!)

As for your sig, I like it much better than the old one, it has 3 images that mesh together very nicely, rounded edges, a picture of yourself, promotion for a game you enjoy playing on the forums, and promotion for your brother's comic!

So overall, 9/10, the last point pending depending on how much I like your music or not :P, but, I guess I should already bump you up to 9.5 just for the effort it takes making music and uploading it on videos for a youtube channel. Keep the good job!

careyhammer wrote:3/10
Animated Pokemen are annoying


You were meant to rate thecamoninja's sig.

The next poster is meant to rate thecamoninja's sig.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:40 am UTC
by thecamoninja
Fuck you I'll rate my own damn sig!
Wait what?

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:04 am UTC
by flicky1991
Well, that link is... strange...
I still like the quote though. I guess... 7/10.

Vytron wrote:Educomix is a thing, with a TVTropes page and all

That page was written almost entirely by me. There is no such thing as notability... XD

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:04 pm UTC
by marionic
I like your sig because it advertises my webcomic.

9/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:53 pm UTC
by flicky1991
I like the quote, and your comic is great. 9/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:07 am UTC
by Odilo
As soon as I have a bit of time, I really need to read all the rules and get back into Pure Nomic IV.

pi/4

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:48 pm UTC
by flicky1991
Well, currently, you're dead, and you've been a zombie a couple of times. XD

(I've already rated Odilo's current signature. Rate his, not mine.)

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:06 pm UTC
by Christophoros
No sig at all - simple, elegant, no mess. 5/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:10 pm UTC
by marionic
flicky1991 wrote:Well, currently, you're dead, and you've been a zombie a couple of times. XD

(I've already rated Odilo's current signature. Rate his, not mine.)
Christophoros wrote:No sig at all - simple, elegant, no mess. 5/10

Christophoros can't read.

I'll give Odilo's sig a 7/10 because hating is pretty fun.
Christophoros can't read, so I won't bother reading the sig and give it a 0/10.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:49 pm UTC
by Nylonathatep
marionic wrote:
thecamoninja wrote:
I was very disappointed when the pizza was not a link to hardcore pornography.


Image



Lacking actual context. 2/10 :(

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:09 pm UTC
by flicky1991
I like that the image features me three times, but the quote misled me into thinking it was a haiku when it wasn't. Therefore, 7/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:40 am UTC
by thecamoninja
Fun quote, I liek yr face, def like the forum comic (though your sig picture could use more rad rainbowshades), your bro's comic is okay too I guess. And it certainly must have been a feat to get it looking so neat and fancy! Unfortunately, the juxtaposition of those three specific images to my eye looks bad; if you're going to have them all in one banner they should go together more rather than contrasting like that
8/11


Also check it out I got a new video in my sig!

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 9:08 am UTC
by marionic
Hm. 7/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:17 pm UTC
by flicky1991
...Hypnotic... 9/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:50 pm UTC
by Vytron
Whoa! I'm featured in a sig! That didn't happen since... 2009! Yeah, I'm officially back in business 8-)

You just took a level in badass, 10/10!

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:55 pm UTC
by marionic
And... Pokémon. 10/10

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:27 pm UTC
by bouer
I just started reading Educomix. You get urine out of 89. Anyone who hasn't read it should do so right now.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:33 pm UTC
by jdj42
10/10
Do bouer's instead of my nonexistent signature.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:12 pm UTC
by Nylonathatep
0/10

... you don't have a signature, and I'm not going to break the rules of this thread :(

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:18 pm UTC
by bouer
8/10

4 quotes = 4 points, constantly cycling new quotes = 2 points, some of the quotes are very funny = 2 points, links to place quotes come from = 1 point.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:12 am UTC
by patzer
Interesting quotes.

8/10.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:06 am UTC
by Thesh
3/10

Not left-aligned, too large, and it's an out of context quote that appears to require context.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:11 am UTC
by cjquines
7/10

Alright.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:12 am UTC
by MotorToad
1/23.8 it has information about a page for a medium that already has a site. How many is too many?

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:23 am UTC
by thecamoninja
4/11
hie first line is confusingly worded and not particularly amusing, though I think I understand what it's saying. It's probably a reference I don't get or something but out of context I'm not impressed
The second line is a quote, apparently, but not formatted like one at all, and again kind of confusing. It's not immediately evident what the four errors are at all.

But I still feel like it has potential to be good with some formatting and corrections and such. It's not a fundamentally flawed signature.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:08 pm UTC
by Plasma Mongoose
Some kind of poem, author unknown. 3/5

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:31 pm UTC
by ArDeeJ
I loathe puns in English, but because I claim to be polite, I'll give it a 7/10.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:34 pm UTC
by thecamoninja
I like puzzles! Your puzzles are pretty hard though. But that's okay! And your most recent tweet happened to link me to a pretty chill song so that's cool.
I've played that 868-Hack game, too. It's also pretty chill. Not sure why you're specifying iDevice and excluding android, unless the game isn't on the android market as well, which would be kind of silly. I was under the impression that it could be gotten for free on the regular internet though, can't it?

All around, a solid signature. Functional. Bit of shameless self promotion, but also a bit of shameless, non-self promotion. I don't mind. 8.5/11
Could be a bit more exciting I guess.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:47 pm UTC
by patzer
Something that appears to be a poem but with no context. 5.5/10.

Re: Rate the signature above you

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:07 am UTC
by Vytron
Gonna give 10/10 because I understand the context and find it hilarious! Also, without context it's also hilarious! That's how good quotes are like.

Anyway, I don't currently have a signature, per se, it's exclusively used to send sigcouragement and only works well in the OTT, in the outside I even hide it mostly, not because I'm ashamed of it or anything, but because I understand it could be annoying if it appeared every single time, specially with its size (I had to cheat to fit it all by using an image - but I don't hide that fact, i.e. it's not aligned with the actual text on purpose.)