Page 1 of 3

### Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 10:56 pm UTC
This is like Mornington Crescent with Pi Day rules.

Alright so the first number we are trying to will be e.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 6:53 pm UTC
ill go for sqrt(2).

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:09 pm UTC
0

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 2:36 am UTC
I just recently familiarized myself with the rules of this variant, so forgive me if my strategy here is less than optimal, I'm still trying to feel it out.

45.1

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 3:05 am UTC
i test out the first triangular square hexagonal number 1225.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:35 pm UTC
Don't often see you around, Poker!

1882

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:24 pm UTC
13

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:51 pm UTC
...Yeah, I've got to go 13.

I'd hoped there wasn't a Dollis Hill equivalent in this version, but it seems it can't be avoided. There must be some equivalent of the fixed-point theorem with these games, though I can't say I see how it follows from the rules.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:10 pm UTC
let try something unorthodox sin(pi/4).

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:16 pm UTC
I don't usually play these games, but since this is the first Friday in the month, I think I can go complex as e(pi/4)i

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:06 pm UTC
0.3

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:01 pm UTC
Einstein theorized that in a 13 loop one could simply reverse it and square it. This was in his later years though so I don't know if it can be trusted.

961

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:03 pm UTC
Objection! The Einstein rules have been superseded by Hawking.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:06 pm UTC
Wasn't Hawking later proven wrong on that? I'm sure I have a paper on this subject around here somewhere.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:09 pm UTC
Without a citation, I'm going to insist that you retract your move.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:14 pm UTC
Okay okay. Back to the loop it is then.

13

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:18 pm UTC
Thanks, dear. <3

300

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 12:14 am UTC
I think I've figured out a way to break out of the loop, in another turn or two.

13

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 10:50 am UTC
30000

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 12:10 pm UTC
13

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 12:11 pm UTC
300000000

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 2:16 pm UTC
And that should do it.

13.00013

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:55 pm UTC
50

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 7:47 pm UTC
i thrust forth with 7.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 7:51 pm UTC
I thrust back with 8.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 3:42 pm UTC
Meanwhile, I'll just avoid with 1313=302875106592253

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:40 pm UTC
I cut through Poker's number to get 875106592.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:40 pm UTC
i cut it in half to make 437553296.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:49 pm UTC
1991

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:57 pm UTC
2048

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:02 pm UTC
i honor code 789.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:39 pm UTC
9322

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:37 pm UTC
almost a wining move, e^e^e.

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:52 pm UTC
93

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:22 pm UTC
ill go for the parallel gambit log(1.618).

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:00 pm UTC
0.00000001

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:27 pm UTC
i shmmy a number in, 1.00000001

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:35 pm UTC
2.00000001

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:39 pm UTC
not much choice gotta try it, 3! (3 factorial).

### Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:49 pm UTC
24