Page 3 of 3

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 6:50 pm UTC
by phillip1882
i go for the eerie position, 32.32.

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon May 13, 2019 4:20 am UTC
by Rosewinsall
Eerie indeed. 666

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 9:23 pm UTC
by phillip1882
i try out something slighty different.
<<>><<<>>><<<<>>>>
(3*5*11)

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 10:36 pm UTC
by Rosewinsall
2.6786793453451234

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 10:13 pm UTC
by phillip1882
close. i'll try the first approach, 1.

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2019 1:25 am UTC
by Rosewinsall
e

I used the little known Socratic Attack to get me at exactly e.

Re: Number Crescent

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2019 1:47 am UTC
by faubi
Ah, but little did you know that your e is actually... dramatically pulls curtain aside... NEGATIVE e! Your plan is foiled, muahaha!

-e