Search found 1444 matches

by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:38 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

Oh snap.
Also yes the last number I posted was definitely bigger than your iterated Ws. Because the V1 Ws added V1 numbers, all of which were less than 1/V1, thus they all added up to less than 1. (In fact, much less)

W(2*V1)
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:36 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Mishrak Was The Last Poster!
Replies: 406
Views: 40822

Re: Be The Last Poster Challenge

But how do you know it's just one apple?

You're running around in circles.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:35 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

One day you will lose your stuff and I will laugh maniacally.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:34 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2051
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:34 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Guess The Next Poster
Replies: 23751
Views: 1893789

Re: Guess The Next Poster

Image
(We'd better be right soon)
Vytron?
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:31 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

So all of that adding of 3s could be left until the very last step But then the whole point of blue operators would be lost. (((0↑ 3 )↑ 3 )↑3)^3)*3)+3 = 0+3 = 3 ((((0+3)*3)^3)↑3)↑ 3 3)↑ 3 3 = humongous number That's why I sum first and do the rest later. h(0) returns Fζ_ω(humongous number) on the F...
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:28 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Mishrak Was The Last Poster!
Replies: 406
Views: 40822

Re: Be The Last Poster Challenge

Why would you assume so?
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:19 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

It is.

Wait for it.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:56 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2047
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:56 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

I'm not. Not yet.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:18 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2046
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:17 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

First rule of computers: Always back up the backup of your backup.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:12 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

Vytron wrote:W(("x+3" [9,9,9,9,9]) + 2) + 1

^Biggest number on the thread.

Because I'm too lazy to keep typing it out over and over again, let's give that obscenely huge number a name:
Let V1="x+3" [9,9,9,9,9]

W(W(V1+2)+1)
^Bigger than yours
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:02 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Mishrak Was The Last Poster!
Replies: 406
Views: 40822

Re: Be The Last Poster Challenge

But again you're assuming that you can grab just "an" (By which you mean "1") apple.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:54 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2044
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:54 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

But everything is sorted out now, and I have 220GB free, I've never had so many space free in my lifetime. (yes, I know 220GB sounds like an extremely large amount, I know that some people only have 7.26GB free. Ha ha ha. I was once like you but now I have ascended. :p FTFY. That said, I'm getting ...
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:20 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

I could have overtaken Whizbang. I think.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:18 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

More points.
by Who
Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:18 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

More points.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 11:12 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Mishrak Was The Last Poster!
Replies: 406
Views: 40822

Re: Be The Last Poster Challenge

But how do you know you're taking out exactly 1 apple? How do you know you're not taking out not-1?

You're using circular logic.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 10:43 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

Points
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:38 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2037
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:38 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

Vytron, you're not usually here at this time.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:22 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Mishrak Was The Last Poster!
Replies: 406
Views: 40822

Re: Be The Last Poster Challenge

But you can't figure out if it has 1 or not-1. That's arbitrary.

There are 3 numbers in the world:
Less than 0
0
More than 0
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:03 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

*Gasps*
He added 1!
W(("x+3" [9,9,9,9,9]) + 2)
Where W(x) is as it was previously defined, "x+3" [9,9,9,9,9] is as Vytron defined it, and +2 is just adding 2.
What do you say to that?
Now my number's the biggest.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:57 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2035
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:16 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

Interesting, it seems the bigger the number the smaller the increase. It looks like you're sending something like "x+3" [9,9,9,9,9].000..."x+3" [9,9,9,9,9] times...0001, or something like that. So I can be the champion again with: ("x+3" [9,9,9,9,9])+1 Where +1 stands ...
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:06 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

Whizbang wrote:
139_Technically.png

I use the word "technically" all the time, and it's even better than only what they say: The word "technically" automatically invalidates any argument made from emotion.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:50 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

Post
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:49 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2029
"X-hundred" is an unacceptable pronunciation unless x<20.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:47 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2014

Right now.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:20 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2011
Eh? People pronounce it some other way than "twenty-number"?
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:08 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Who won at 1953? Count to 3906: Double Post Edition

2009
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:07 pm UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

I would come up with my own function for making huge numbers, but that would take far too much effort to understand yours to know that it is in fact bigger. So instead I'll do the following: Let us define the function W(x)=x+x^-x (That notation is completely standard. + means addition, ^ means expon...
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:57 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Mishrak Was The Last Poster!
Replies: 406
Views: 40822

Re: Be The Last Poster Challenge

And I can argue that you're wrong.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:49 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post: Count to a Million Edition
Replies: 41635
Views: 2423699

Re: Re:bleh

1986
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:46 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

Genius is an end, not a means.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:44 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Your number is, in fact, not bigger!
Replies: 1240
Views: 155797

Re: My number is, in fact, bigger!

I see lots of functions but no numbers. What is currently the highest number?
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:41 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

I lack effort.
by Who
Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:37 am UTC
Forum: Forum Games
Topic: Double Post
Replies: 105292
Views: 6255595

Re: Double Post

Vytron, I would play that game but there's too much of a reading overhead.

That said, I think I could define the cake(x,n) function such that I could temporarily take the lead, but it would be so much effort.

Go to advanced search